CSci 4511w: Writing Assignments

Always include the number of the writing you are submitting, your name and ID on any material you submit for grading.
Unless otherwise instructed you are free to format your writings as you want. Please use single spacing and a font size of 11 or bigger. Typically a page has 25-30 lines.
Each writing assignment can be resubmitted for regrading, unless otherwise specified. You are allowed one resubmission per writing, which has to be within two weeks from when you received the original writing back. When you submit for regrading, please submit also the original writing.

Writing 5 - due Tuesday April 20

This is the next step for your project report. The major part you need to include in it is a 2-3 pages literature review of relevant publications related to your project. The review should include 8-10 relevant references with bibliographic citations. For each of the references you should write a sentence or two describing briefly what that reference talks about and the approach taken in it, and comparing it to your own work. Your work can follow the same lines or can take a different approach. What is important is to show some mastery of the relevant work done by others on the subject of your project. If there are multiple team members please specify the contribution of each member.

There will not be time to resubmit this writing, but you will receive this writing back within a week, so you'll be able to use the feedback to improve your final paper.
You are welcome to include in this writing any additional material that you will have in your final project. This is the last chance to have it reviewed before the final submission.

Writing 4 - due Thursday March 25

This is a short proposal for your project and a report on any initial work you have done. It should be two to three pages long and should include: In this writing you need to include a picture, a table, and an equation. Grading criteria: (1) 35% for the contents, (2) 25% for the writing style, (3) 10% for using Latex and bibtex, (4) 10% for including in the proposal at least one figure, (5) 10% for including in the proposal at least one table, (5) 10% for including in the proposal at least one equation.

Writing 3 - due Tuesday February 23

Resubmission due by Thursday March 25
For this writing you will start reporting ideas on research that will lead you to your class project. When starting research in any subject, the first step is to do a quick literature search to get acquainted with the basic issues in the subject. This is not a full literature review (you will do it for a later writing assignment), it is just the first step in thinking about problems and questions you might want to address in your project.
  1. write approximatively 1 page describing the topic (or topics) you are interested in, why they are interesting, and what you think you will do. Provide a few sentences on who has studied them with relevant citations. You do not need to make any commitment at this point to what you will do for your project.
  2. include at least 5 bibliographical references of different types (journal article, book, conference paper, technical report or thesis, and url). Format the references using bibtex. If your latex implementation does not include url as a recognized field, use note for the field, followed by whatever you want to include. You can look at http://www.andy-roberts.net/misc/latex/latextutorial3.html for details on how to do bibliographies in Latex.
Grading criteria: (1) 1/4 for the contents of the writing, (2) 1/4 for the writing style, (3) 1/4 for using Latex for the writing and using bibtex to generate the bibliography, and (4) 1/4 for including at least 5 bibliographical references of different types (journal article, book, conference paper, technical report or thesis, and url).

Writing 2 - due Tuesday February 9

Resubmission due by Thursday March 11
Question 1.2 from the 3rd edition of the textbook, which says
"Read Turing's original paper on AI (Turing, 1950). In the paper, he discusses several objections to his proposed enterprise and his test for intelligence. Which objections still carry weight? Are his refutations valid? Can you think of new objections arising from developments since he wrote the paper? In the paper, he predicts that, by the year 2000, a computer will have a 30% chance of passing a five minute Turing Test with an unskilled interrogator. What chance do you think a computer would have today? In another 50 years?"
  1. read the paper A. M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, pp. 433-460, 1950.
  2. to do good writing you need to get informed on more recent developments on Turing Test. For instance, you can look at the Loebner Prize and then read about some criticism of the prize in Lessons from a Restricted Turing Test by Stuart M. Shieber, Harvard University, April 15, 1993.
    In Response by Hugh Loebner.
    This is an example, by no means these are the only additional sources of information.
  3. write 2 pages answering the questions listed above and using any of the additional information you have found to support your arguments. Do not forget to include references to the work you use.
  4. You have to use Latex. Look for instructions on Latex in the Material on Writing.
Grading criteria: 1/4 for answering the questions, 1/4 for using additional cited information to support your answers, 1/4 for writing style, and 1/4 for using Latex.
Please look at the forum for discussion on latex. Two important things I said there: (1) for this time only you can write the references any way you like, without having to use bibtex; (2) for this time only you are allowed to submit the .dvi file using submit if you cannot generate the .pdf file from the .dvi file.
I hope this will reduce the level of anxieties this assignment has created.

Writing 1 - due Tuesday January 26

  1. Select and read one of the papers from The Singularity Issue of IEEE Spectrum. The papers are all short and written for a general educated public. The issue is accessible from campus. If you access it from outside campus, you will have to authenticate with your X.500 account.
  2. Write a 1-page summary and review of the paper you have read. Your summary should be 8-10 lines long and say succintly what is in the paper. Not your opinion about the paper but a summary of the paper itself. The idea is that a reader who has not read the paper should be able to find out what the paper is about. The summary should be followed by your comments and opinion about the paper. You are free to express your own opinion, but as much as possible you should base your opinions on science. For instance, you can bring an example from another paper or book that contraddicts what the author says.
  3. Bring your writing to class on Tuesday. We will divide in groups, each student will read the writing of another student, then each group will have a short discussion on the papers read.
  4. At the end of the class turn in your writing to get credit.
Grading criteria: 1/3 for the summary, 1/3 for the comments, and 1/3 for writing style.
Copyright: © 2010 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota
Department of Computer Science and Engineering. All rights reserved.
Comments to: Maria Gini
Changes and corrections are in red.