Dear ba'c Huy, ba'c Tua^'nVN et al,
Ca'm o+n hai ba'c ra^'t nhie^`u dda~ cung ca^'p cho Hoa`ng nhie^`u y'
kie^'n co' gia' tri. . DDo.c thu+ hai ba'c xong H. pha?i suy nghi~
hai nga`y tro+`i tru+o+'c khi vie^'t tie^'p ve^` dde^` ta`i na`y
tre^n list.
DDu'ng la` dda^`y ddu? nha^'t thi` pha?i nghie^n cu+'u vu+`a bio
vu+`a psycho va` socio thi` mo+'i co' ke^'t lua^.n dda^`y ddu? ve^`
chuye^.n hu't thuo^'c la'. Ke.t no^~i ca'i nghie^n cu+'u H. sa('p
thu+.c hie^.n thie^n ve^` u+'ng du.ng ho+n la` ly' thuye^'t thua^`n
tu'y vi` chu? ye^'u la` phu.c vu. cho public health. H. cu~ng bie^'t
la` genes ta'c ddo^.ng le^n nhie^`u thu+' la('m, ke.t la` dde^? can
thie^.p trong ddie^`u kie^.n hie^.n ta.i ta.i Vie^.t Nam, chu? ye^'u
la` qua health education va` health policies ho+n la` ca'c ta'c
ddo^.ng dde^'n gene . Ma` he^~ no'i dde^'n social sciences thi`
ddu'ng nhu+ anh Huy no'i, ca'c arguments cu?a no' gio^'ng nhu+ coffee
table talk va^.y . Chi'n ngu+o+`i mu+o+`i ... ma^'y y', research
ke^'t qua? dda' nhau tu+ng bu+`ng. H. to^'t nghie^.p medical doctor
nhu+ng sau ddo' thi` ddi la`m ve^` health education, ro^`i ho.c the^m
la^'y ca'i master ve^` health social sciences. Thuo+? ban dda^`u
ho.c, tha^'y ma^'y cha social scientists no'i chuye^.n la`ng nha`ng
kho^ng ra la`m sao, chi.u kho^ng ddu+o+.c. Ro^`i thi` nga`y tha'ng
tro^i qua bi. nha`o na(.n rie^'t dda^m ra cu~ng bi. a?nh hu+o+?ng. :(
Nhie^`u la^`n ddo.c ma^'y ca'i ke^'t qua? cu?a mo^.t so^' nghie^n
cu+'u trong social sciences nha^'t la` ma^'y ca'i qualitative
research tha^'y tu+'c cu+o+`i ... ra nu+o+'c ma('t. Trong ca'i kinh
nghie^.m nho? be' cu?a H. thi` trong social sciences ca'i review
literature ddo'ng vai tro` kha' quan tro.ng bo+?i ta.i kho^ng bie^'t
du+.a va`o dda^u ne^n chi? co`n du+.a va`o lo+`i no'i cu?a ngu+o+`i
ddi tru+o+'c (ma` lo+`i no'i cu?a ngu+o+`i ddi tru+o+'c dda^u co'
cha('c ddu'ng :( ). Reliability trong nghie^n cu+'u cu?a social
sciences luo^n luo^n la` va^'n dde^` kho^ng co' absolute answer. :(
>I do not want to talk down to the
group that Hoang is about to collaborate, but
I DO think that group does not have a good
reputation in the field.
H. cu~ng bie^'t ddie^`u na`y . DDo' la` no^~i kho^? cu?a khoa ho.c
trong nu+o+'c. Vi` kho^ng co' tie^`n ne^n luo^n pha?i chi.u lu.y
ngu+o+`i kha'c, kho^ng ddu+o+.c na('m the^' chu? ddo^.ng. Chu+a ke^?
bi. lo+.i du.ng la`m "cu li" thu tha^.p so^' lie^.u . Nhie^`u khi
muo^'n ca~i, muo^'n chu+?i ma` ha' mie^.ng kho^ng ddu+o+.c. Tho^i
dda`nh su+? du.ng mo^.t chie^u ma` anh Tua^'nVN co' mo^.t la^`n dda~
chi? ve~: mi`nh tranh thu? tie^`n cu?a no', thu ve'n la`m the^m mo^.t
so^' no^.i dung kha'c ke`m theo sau ddo' pha^n ti'ch rie^ng, ti`m
ca'ch publish dda' ca'i te^n no' qua mo^.t be^n.
De^? H. tie^'p tu.c co^ng vie^.c review literature va` further ca'i
study na`y . Co' gi` la.i ca^`u cu+'u the^m ca'c ba'c.
Tha`nh tha^.t ca'm o+n ca'c ba'c.
Tro.ng Hoa`ng
The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.