• Sorted by Date • Classified by Publication Type • Classified by Research Category •
Wolfgang Ketter, Elena Kryzhnyaya, Steven Damer, Colin McMillen, Amrudin Agovic, John Collins, and Maria Gini. Analysis and Design of Supply-Driven Strategies in TAC-SCM. In Workshop: Trading Agent Design and Analysis at Third Int'l Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 44–51, New York, July 2004.
[PDF]314.4kB [postscript]410.8kB
We describe two sales strategies used by our agent, MinneTAC, for the 2003 Supply Chain Management Trading Agent Competition (TAC SCM). Both strategies estimate, as the game progresses, the probability of receiving a customer order for different prices and compute the expected profit. Offers are made to maximize the expected profit on each order. The main difference between the two strategies is in how the probability of receiving an order and the offer prices are computed. The first strategy works well in high-demand games, the second was developed to improve performance in low-demand games. We empirically analyze the effect of the discount given by suppliers on orders received the first day of the game, and we show that in high-demand games there is a strong correlation between the offers an agent receives from suppliers on the first day of the game and the agent's performance in the game.
@InProceedings{Ketter04tada,
author = "Wolfgang Ketter and Elena Kryzhnyaya and Steven Damer
and Colin McMillen and Amrudin Agovic and John Collins
and Maria Gini",
title = "Analysis and Design of Supply-Driven Strategies in {TAC-SCM}",
booktitle = "Workshop: {Trading Agent Design and Analysis} at Third Int'l Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems",
pages = {44--51},
year = "2004",
abstract = "We describe two sales strategies used by our agent,
MinneTAC, for the 2003 Supply Chain Management Trading Agent
Competition (TAC SCM). Both strategies estimate, as the game
progresses, the probability of receiving a customer order for
different prices and compute the expected profit. Offers are made
to maximize the expected profit on each order. The main difference
between the two strategies is in how the probability of receiving an
order and the offer prices are computed. The first strategy works
well in high-demand games, the second was developed to improve
performance in low-demand games. We empirically analyze the effect
of the discount given by suppliers on orders received the first day
of the game, and we show that in high-demand games there is a strong
correlation between the offers an agent receives from suppliers on
the first day of the game and the agent's performance in the game."
address = {New York},
month = {July},
bib2html_pubtype = {Refereed Workshop/Symposium},
bib2html_rescat = {Trading Agents: Supply-Chain Management},
}
Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:14:17
The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.